Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-21-Speech-4-183"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101021.19.4-183"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-21-Speech-4-9942
lpv:speaker	lp:Viorica Dăncilă2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AGRI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Partidul Social Democrat (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2012-05-20)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2010-05-04--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". We are all aware that the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) does not provide for any exception to the principle of non-eligibility for Community financing. As a result, this allows a certain degree of flexibility on a case-by-case basis. The authorising officer can, if appropriate, decide to fund these costs to ensure the smooth running of the programmes and projects. However, this flexibility is essential for certain recurring situations where deadlock occurs because tax exemption mechanisms are absent or impractical. In these situations, the rigid formulation of the DCI instruments may make the action financed by external aid extremely difficult. This is why I support the proposal to submit a request to the Commission to table legislative proposals for alignment with the RPS procedure and to ensure that this instrument complies with the new comitology requirements."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph