Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-21-Speech-4-070"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Integrated Maritime Policy (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101021.5.4-070"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-21-Speech-4-0712
lpv:speaker	lp:Ville Itälä2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (2009-07-14--2012-02-29)3 member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2012-02-29)3 substitute; AGRI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-14--2012-02-29)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2012-02-29)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I wish to thank the rapporteur for her excellent work, and especially for the proper way in which she views the International Maritime Organisation’s decision on sulphur emissions. I hope that the Commission will actually take this decision into account, one that today is bound to be adopted unanimously in Parliament. The IMO’s decision was a hasty one, with no assessment of environmental impact and no estimates of costs. The EU should not repeat the IMO’s mistake. If different emissions limits are set for the north compared with the south, competition will be distorted and so will the rules within the EU. The emissions limits must be the same. I am absolutely certain that it will be contrary to EU competition law if this goes ahead. What will this mean for my country, for example? It will mean that industry will face an additional bill of approximately EUR 1 billion a year. Finnish jobs are at risk, even though we are doing all we can here to increase the number of jobs in the EU. We speak of the Europe 2020 strategy, but we make other sorts of decisions that take these jobs away. Cargo for Finland is transferred to Russian ships, which then take the goods to Finland on trucks, because Russia is not going to ratify this decision by the IMO. This can hardly be what the EU wants. The Swedes have said that they will start to transport by truck what now goes by ship. We would therefore be making a bad decision for the environment and a bad decision for future European jobs. I hope that the Commission actually understands this decision, which is being taken unanimously in Parliament today."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph