Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-19-Speech-2-393"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Budget review (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101019.21.2-393"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-19-Speech-2-3952
lpv:speaker	lp:Salvador Garriga Polledo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PECH (2010-07-07--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2013-04-14)3 member; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2012-03-11)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-24--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2012-03-01)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, it would have been interesting if, instead of leaving the Chamber, Mr Verhofstadt had also read the European Commission documents. One of them explains, precisely, that this budget review has been delayed because there was an agreement with Parliament to conduct it once the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force. Honestly! I would like to thank the Commissioner for the communication that he has presented to us, which is a good intellectual exercise on how the financial perspectives have worked so far and how the subsequent ones should work. I would also like to thank you for highlighting the weak points of these financial perspectives, in particular, the scandalous inability of the current financial framework to respond to unexpected needs. I would like to remind you that the only response that there has been so far when we have encountered an unexpected need has been to take money from agriculture to fund other things. This cannot continue to happen in the future. However, Commissioner, although I recognise the difficulty of your current position of offering a review, which cannot, under any circumstances, be confused with a revision, and while I recognise that you have really done an excellent job, I cannot resist the temptation to read out loud the memorandum accompanying the statement that was presented: ‘The EU budget review: Frequently Asked Questions’. ‘What is the communication on the budget review?’ ‘What is it not?’ ‘Why a budget review?’ Three very elegant questions to explain the inexplicable: the fact that in this communication, unfortunately, there are no figures."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph