Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-18-Speech-1-145"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20101018.15.1-145"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"Thank you very much Mr President. Take it as a mitigating circumstance that there is apparently not a great deal of excitement and interest in this important subject, so I am not wasting many people’s time.
Any data protection process or any procedure violating fundamental data protection interests must be related to a clearly identifiable aim and should have the ability to achieve that justifiable aim. What exactly, according to the US, is the justifiable aim, and how will the transfer of personal data be able to achieve that aim? In other words, how are they going to use these data? That is my first question to the Commission.
I would also like to ask why they use two different levels of scrutiny – one for the ‘old’ Member States and one for the ‘newer’ Member States, including my own country, Hungary. Why would a Hungarian citizen be more dangerous from the point of view of terrorism than any citizen from the ‘older’ Member States? Did this issue arise during the negotiations, or is it going to be an issue?"@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata | |
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples