Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-09-20-Speech-1-052"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-09-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100920.17.1-052"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-09-20-Speech-1-0532
lpv:speaker	lp:Peter van Dalen2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ENVI (2009-07-21--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; TRAN (2009-07-20--2012-01-18)3 substitute; EMPL (2009-11-10--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; PECH (2009-07-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; ChristenUnie (2009-12-11--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I should just like to start by raising a point of order. Our shadow rapporteur, Mrs Foster, has just informed me that she is unable to attend. She will be arriving later on this evening, and so I should like to use her speaking time. Firstly, I wish to offer the rapporteur sincere thanks for the excellent work she has done. Both this regulation itself and its quality will benefit air traffic in Europe and also air traffic safety. However, if we really want to draw lessons from accidents, investigations must be completely free from interference: interference in the airlines by consumer organisations and, above all, interference by judicial authorities. If public administrations are able to interfere in independent investigations, the independence of those investigations is at risk. This would be like the butcher retaining influence over the inspection of his own meat, and that cannot be our aim. Therefore, the best thing would have been for us to introduce the ‘Canadian model’. This would have meant having a completely independent investigating authority that invited the judicial authorities to participate in an investigation on the basis of objective criteria where a crime had been committed. That is the system we use in the Netherlands, where we have an independent investigation board that functions excellently. This investigation board regularly reprimands even public administrations in no uncertain terms. That is the best system, and now the text we have agreed with the Council offers the opportunity of introducing independent investigations of this kind. Nevertheless, the overall package represents a real step forward. The provision of information on passengers involved in an accident, in particular, is a great improvement, and for this reason, we shall not be abstaining from voting tomorrow but shall instead be supporting the rapporteur by voting in favour."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph