Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-09-09-Speech-4-123"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100909.11.4-123"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I recognise the importance of clear legislation, a reduced administrative burden for businesses, the quality of impact studies, the fact that they should be taken into account (which does not always appear to be the case, far from it), and above all strict compliance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, to which every legislative act coming out of Brussels must be subject. On the other hand, I find it regrettable that, while the report repeatedly points the finger at what it calls ‘gold-plating’ of legislation by the Member States, it does not mention a highly interesting piece of information that appears in the explanatory statement. Of the thousands of legislative acts in force, 72 alone have imposed 486 information obligations, resulting in over 10 000 implementing acts in the Member States. It seems to me that this information reveals the opposite: that the roots of this evil lie in the Commission’s hyper-regulation. More fundamentally, I wonder whether there is anything other than formal respect for the principle of subsidiarity, in that the Treaties provide for areas in which the European Union has exclusive competence and which cannot be called into question at all, while in all other areas it seems that certain national parliaments are still unable to fully exercise their rights on the subject."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples