Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-07-06-Speech-2-485"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20100706.31.2-485"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Technically and legally, I understand the Commissioner’s response. Politically, and in terms of real commitment to fundamental rights, it makes no sense and it runs completely counter to Articles 6 and 7 of the treaty, which say the EU and its Member States will obey the convention. Indeed, a mechanism was put into Article 7 to try to make sure that Member States do not breach human rights, so how is what the Commission said compatible with the mechanism under Article 7? We need a peer review system; we need monitoring mechanisms. I am afraid that answer shows why the Commission is so feeble about pursuing human rights breaches in the Member States."@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph