Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-07-06-Speech-2-482"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100706.31.2-482"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-07-06-Speech-2-4832
lpv:speaker	lp:Joanna Senyszyn2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; CULT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Thank you, Mr Šemeta, for your answer. Unfortunately, I do not find it satisfactory. Monitoring execution of ECHR judgments would, however, appear to be essential, because some Member States will not want to comply with them voluntarily. I have a supplementary question related to rulings of the Court concerning breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights and, in particular, the case of Lautsi v. Italy. In a judgment passed on 3 November 2009, the Court held that hanging crucifixes in classrooms is a violation of human rights, and on 15 June 2010, in the case of Grzelak v. Poland, it held that the lack of opportunity for a schoolboy to attend lessons in ethics in the majority of Polish schools is also a violation of human rights. Is the Polish legislation, which was held by the Court to be at fault in these two cases, also at variance with the draft ..."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President cut off the speaker)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph