Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-06-16-Speech-3-969"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-06-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100616.24.3-969"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-06-16-Speech-3-9682
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Paulo Alves2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Socialista (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AGRI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted in favour of the resolution for the following reasons: I consider that, in view of the increase in administrative expenditure and especially due to the possible presence of expenditure of an operational nature, the Council’s expenditure should be scrutinised in the same way as that of the other EU institutions as part of the discharge procedure provided for by Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; I agree that Parliament’s position is to reject the Council’s statement that the fact that Parliament and the Council have not, in the past, scrutinised the implementation of their respective sections of the budget was due to the gentlemen’s agreement (resolution recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting of 22 April 1970); I consider the gentlemen’s agreement not to be a binding document and the interpretation given to it by the Council to be excessively broad; I believe that the preparation of the budget and the discharge of the budget are two separate procedures and that the gentlemen’s agreement between the Council and Parliament on the preparation of their respective sections of the budget must not exonerate the Council of its responsibility to be fully accountable to the public for the funds placed at its disposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph