Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-18-Speech-2-881"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100518.32.2-881"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-18-Speech-2-4352
lpv:speaker	lp:Rafał Trzaskowski2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2009-07-14--2013-12-02)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2012-02-02)3 substitute; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; AFCO (2009-07-20--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-29--2013-12-02)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2013-12-02)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2013-12-02)3
lpv:translated text	"When we talk about accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, we are talking about work which has been going on for 10 years now and about many fears concerning, inter alia, competition between the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. This will certainly lead to problems in the area of jurisdiction and the autonomy of the Court of Justice. I think, however, that what we have achieved after those 10 years can mean complementarity of the two systems, so perhaps we should depart from such hierarchical thinking. The Court of Justice has, for a long time, been following the work of the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and vice versa. Both these systems coexist and there is no competition between them, so perhaps those fears are unjustified. We need accession to the convention for symbolic reasons but, above all, we need the convention because it will complement the system of protection of human rights in the European Union and will give it greater credibility in the eyes of its citizens, for they will gain protection against the European Union and its institutions, and not only against the Member States, as has been the case until now. So we should be glad that the system will be strengthened. However, we do need a certain loyalty, so that we do not undermine the credibility of the system. This is why we propose that Member States do not prosecute each other on matters of EU law by using the possibilities afforded by the convention."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph