Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-05-Speech-3-822"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100505.69.3-822"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs |
member; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
|
| lpv:translated text |
"I was not able to vote in favour of this text because one of the objectives of the strategic partnership is to conclude subregional partnership agreements with Central America, Peru and Colombia, and Mercosur, despite the
in Honduras and the illegitimate Government that Porfirio Lobo has formed as a result. The EU cannot treat governments that have been part of a
in the same way as elected governments. Likewise, the objective of creating a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area does not take into account the asymmetries between the regions. The current terms of the Association Agreement between the EU and Peru and Colombia are similar to those of a free trade agreement, and it will not benefit the European or Latin American people. I also do not agree with the possibility of opening up a triangular political dialogue (such as EU-Latin America-United States). There are already multilateral organisations such as the United Nations for this sort of dialogue. It also includes the creation of the Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Foundation. I would not be opposed to this concept if the rapporteur were not proposing that it be established using public and private capital, which is a clear way in for multinationals."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples