Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-03-11-Speech-4-117"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-03-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100311.12.4-117"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-03-11-Speech-4-1182
lpv:speaker	lp:Ramón Jáuregui Atondo2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 member; AFCO (2009-07-16--2010-10-19)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2010-10-20)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2010-10-20)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2009-07-14--2010-10-20)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to speak on behalf of Mrs Muñiz to explain why the Spanish delegation within the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament has voted against Amendment 2 tabled by the Confederal Group of the European United Left – Nordic Green Left, even though the amendment requested that the Spanish Presidency be supported in its dealings with Cuba. Firstly, may I bring to mind the fact that we cannot support amendments tabled by a group that has sought to distance itself from the resolution as a whole, and that our commitment to all the political groups who have signed the resolution would not allow us to support a partial amendment of the document. Secondly, Amendment 2 tabled by the GUE/NGL Group is not in line with the position taken by the Spanish Presidency, which is looking to establish a consensus in the European Union in order to renew our framework for relations with Cuba, but not for a complete break with the Common Position, which is what the amendment was calling for. That is our reason for rejecting the amendment."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph