Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-02-10-Speech-3-548"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-02-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Body scanners - Operation of intelligence services in the context of counter-terrorism strategies (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100210.29.3-548"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-02-10-Speech-3-5492
lpv:speaker	lp:Michèle Rivasi2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Europe Écologie (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2013-09-18)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2011-12-12)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to make the connection between the scanner, health and terrorism. What does the Interagency Committee on Radioprotection, which brings together the European Commission, the IAEA – the International Atomic Energy Agency – and the Nuclear Energy Agency say? It says that pregnant women and children must not be subjected to body scans, even if the doses are extremely small. Indeed, we should be aware that frequent exposure to low doses of radiation can cause cancers and malformations. My question therefore concerns justification of the risks. Given the existence of alternative technologies that enable the same goals to be achieved, these scanners really do need to be justified in relation to the given objective, and we need to know …"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President cut off the speaker)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph