Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-02-09-Speech-2-316"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-02-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Key objectives for the Conference of the Parties to the CITES (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100209.15.2-316"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-02-09-Speech-2-3172
lpv:speaker	lp:Giovanni La Via2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2010-05-04)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2013-05-21)3 member; AGRI (2009-07-16--2010-05-04)3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-12-15)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2013-06-12)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, in view of the controversial scientific data that we have heard from several parties and in view of a stock level that is certainly not yet, not even in the worst-case scenario, such as to warrant compulsory inclusion in Appendix I, I do not believe that such a restrictive measure, even with the limitations that clearly would be placed on certain territories in terms of fishing, is the best solution. Also, in the light of the efforts that have been made in recent years towards reducing the level of fishing by specialist tuna fishing companies, in my view, we need to continue in this direction, keeping tuna in Appendix II and avoiding rushing ahead, which would be extremely dangerous for some territories and for companies in the sector."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph