Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-01-20-Speech-3-264"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-01-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Outcome of the Copenhagen Summit on climate change (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100120.15.3-264"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-01-20-Speech-3-2652
lpv:speaker	lp:András Gyürk2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2011-12-14)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2010-06-15)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2009-07-16--2011-12-14)3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The Copenhagen conference on climate change was disappointing. There were no legally binding commitments determining the future framework of international climate protection. The situation is aggravated by the fact that despite its intention, the EU was unable to significantly influence the final outcome of the negotiations. The failure of the conference does not justify idleness. We have to get used to the idea of emphasising regional solutions until an international treaty is drawn up that is legally binding for every player. Accordingly, the European Union should work on polishing up its internal regulations on climate protection. The regulations of the Union should be made more efficient without causing competitive disadvantage for European industries. However, the EU’s climate policy should not disadvantage new Member States either, as was the case with the internal EU burden-sharing agreement recently. When it comes to climate protection, solutions that have many additional effects on top of decreasing emissions should be preferred. Thus, the development of urban transport improves the quality of life, the investments in improving energy efficiency create jobs, and the amounts spent on Research and Development improve competitiveness at the same time. These points of view should also be reflected in the budget for the next seven years. Europe cannot afford to only be a spectator at international negotiations on climate protection. It should continue to take the initiative even if, instead of ground-breaking changes, climate politics will now be characterised by small, incremental steps."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph