Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-26-Speech-4-249"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Laos and Vietnam2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091126.23.4-249"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-26-Speech-4-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Zbigniew Ziobro2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2009-07-21--2011-12-28)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (2009-07-14--2011-12-28)3 member; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2011-12-28)3 member; PECH (2009-07-14--2011-12-28)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, we should note with satisfaction every measure which is intended to stress the importance of human rights and to highlight instances in which they are not observed in some parts of the world, in countries where people’s fundamental rights are violated. When, however, we turn our attention to the violation of these rights, we must pay particular attention to those situations in particular countries in which there are violations of the rights of people of different religions and of their right to free expression of their faith and attachment in the area of religious liberty, and to demonstrate their convictions in this realm. Therefore, we should raise the alarm in every instance of drastic violations in this area. We should also remember that, here in Europe, we should always be an example of a place on the world map which remains a model of great tradition, liberty, freedom and respect for other religions. This is why it is with a certain unease that I notice something. It is something which cannot, of course, be compared to the facts referred to here in this Chamber. I am thinking of a trend which is appearing in the judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, which seems to encroach on the area of freedom of religion and the traditions of particular countries, in this case, the ruling on Italy and crosses. I think that rulings of this kind may also create a certain bad atmosphere, where some symbols and emphases are open to misinterpretation. In summary, every gesture and every action which increases the importance of human rights is significant, and we should talk openly about this, especially in the case of countries where basic human rights are violated."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph