Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-24-Speech-2-269"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Hour with the President of the Commission2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091124.31.2-269"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-24-Speech-2-2702
lpv:speaker	lp:Mitro Repo2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; CULT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue/Finlands Socialdemokratiska Parti (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, with reference to last week’s meeting, I would like to ask if you yourself are happy with the selection process by which two important top posts were filled, or do you also agree that some of the Union’s decision-making procedures could still do with a large dose of extra transparency and democracy? I would like to ask you if the selection method applied, where the candidates appeared as if out of thin air, was a way to confirm the EU’s authority, and did it boost confidence in EU decision making? Should the big political groups be thinking seriously about what sort of candidates to put forward for top positions in the future, whether the selection process can be revised and improved in some way, and who should do it? Presumably, that will be the task of the European Parliament and its Members. This time, Finland had highly qualified candidates and we should be glad about that."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph