Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-11-Speech-3-194"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Joint Programming of research to combat neurodegenerative diseases, in particular Alzheimer’s disease (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091111.18.3-194"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-11-Speech-3-9892
lpv:speaker	lp:António Fernando Correia De Campos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2012-04-11)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the Commission’s communication to Parliament offers an optimistic analysis of the expected benefits of cooperation in research among Member States and of the coordination that the Commission can carry out, in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme, with regard to neurodegenerative diseases, and Alzheimer’s disease in particular. The measures proposed in the communication only concern the principle of making better use of existing resources and programmes: the ‘Health’ Programme, the Seventh Framework Programme, the EU Action Plan on disabilities, the open method of coordination and the Statistical Programme. Will optimising our use of these resources be enough to achieve the expected results? What coordination mechanisms is the Commission proposing that could not have been implemented before the communication? What added value does it provide? What new, practical measures is the Commission thinking of adopting to stimulate cooperation in research, in a situation where resources and teams already exist, although they are fragmented? Will giving greater visibility to the issue and using existing instruments be enough to resolve it?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph