Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-11-Speech-3-128"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU-Russia Summit on 18 November 2009 in Stockholm (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091111.16.3-128"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-11-Speech-3-1292
lpv:speaker	lp:Anna Rosbach2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (2009-10-06--2011-03-07)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2011-03-07)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2011-03-07)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-22--2011-03-07)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-22--2011-03-07)3 unknown; Dansk Folkeparti (2009-07-14--2011-03-07)3 member; EFD (2009-07-14--2011-03-07)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2011-03-07)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, in Russia, there is freedom of the press in name only, not in practice. Critical journalists are intimidated, persecuted and murdered. Russia is ranked 153 in the worldwide press freedom index – in other words, press freedom in Russia is now worse than in Belarus, Sudan and Zimbabwe. Should this really be rewarded? Yet it does not stop there. We have the issue of gas supplies to European citizens. Again this year, we are seeing Russia threatening to disrupt gas supplies and there are indications that we will need to prepare for this possibility every winter in future. Yet can it really be right that we reward Russia for this? I would like to suggest to the Council and the Commission that, instead of merely talking nicely to the Russians, it might be appropriate to speak out and say that this quite simply is not acceptable. What do you actually intend to do about the negative developments in the relationship between Russia and the EU? Or do you merely intend to let things carry on as they are? Do you actually want to reward this negative development?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph