Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-05-06-Speech-3-363"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-05-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries concerning sectoral matters and covering applicable law in contractual and non-contractual obligations - Bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries on judgments and decisions in matrimonial matters, parental responsibility and maintenance obligations - Development of an EU criminal justice area (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090506.39.3-363"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-05-06-Speech-3-3642
lpv:speaker	lp:Luca Romagnoli2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-05-23--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; NA (2007-11-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; LIBE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Movimento Sociale Fiamma tricolore (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I am partly in agreement with the three reports we are discussing. Mr Zwiefka’s report is easier to swallow because it makes the procedure for negotiating and concluding bilateral agreements on sectoral aspects between Member States and non-EU countries homogeneous and, all things considered, more transparent. As for Mr Deprez’s report, I essentially agree with the second half, when it refers to the necessary consistency required of the Commission if we intend to develop a Community policy concerning external relations in the judicial co-operation sector. However, when it comes the possibility of the Member States concluding the agreements themselves, as a nationalist I am of course pleased with this and hope that it is not a process that is necessarily limited in scope and time. Lastly, I must honestly say that I have some doubts about Mrs Pagano’s European Parliament recommendation. I am grateful to her for having pointed out and supported the use of justice, all the more so because I was responsible for drawing up the report, and I still owe a debt of gratitude to those who co-operated to ensure its success. However, my awareness of subjects concerning the fundamental freedoms of victims, and also of suspects and defendants, as well as the need to implement the judicial training of judges and operators, lead me to remark that we still have a long way to go in this area – at least we certainly do in Italy. Furthermore, when it comes to the European arrest warrant, frankly my doubts turn into outright opposition. I nevertheless thank the rapporteurs for having worked on these subjects with skill and precision."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"e"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph