Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-05-06-Speech-3-261"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-05-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market (A6-0263/2009 , Jean Lambert)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090506.32.3-261"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-05-06-Speech-3-2622
lpv:speaker	lp:Lydia Schenardi2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; FEMM (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; AGRI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; NA (2007-11-14--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"We approve of the desire to replace the 1993 directive in a way that improves and standardises conditions of slaughter throughout the European Union. We also approve of the principle according to which animals should only be slaughtered using methods which ensure instant death or death after stunning, but we are totally against the idea of permitting exemptions in the framework of religious rites. Public opinion is very sensitive and completely opposed to unnecessary, painful practices. Why tolerate them, then, in the name of religion, irrespective of whether or not the animals are immobilised prior to being killed? Strict legislation that provides for verification of the procedures must be introduced to ensure that animals are stunned and cannot regain consciousness before dying, but it would be even better to prohibit such practices completely. They are from another age and can be rightly termed barbaric."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph