Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-01-14-Speech-3-301"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-01-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Situation in the Middle East/Gaza Strip (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090114.16.3-301"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-01-14-Speech-3-3022
lpv:speaker	lp:Jana Hybášková2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Evropští demokraté (2004-10-01--2009-05-06)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2005-02-21--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iran (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 chair; Delegation for relations with Israel (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, let me congratulate you on the results of your joint negotiations, the troika negotiations in Israel. Unlike the press, we know that it was your mission which led the Israeli side to debate the opening-up of humanitarian corridors and a daily ceasefire. I think this is the first time the Israelis have accepted Europe as a major partner and the Czech Presidency as an important representative. Despite enormous pressure from the left, the European Parliament yesterday agreed on a quite exceptional resolution. Even in such extreme circumstances, this is a balanced resolution, a resolution that can be supported by the right, a resolution which is not just a pamphlet or a political victory for the left. We have avoided inserting an equals sign, however notional, between an existing State and a terrorist movement. Recognising the existence of the State of Israel, renouncing violence and the entry of Hamas into PLO agreements remain the key objectives, as does the requirement of achieving a permanent ceasefire as soon as possible. Yet we have provided no added value. The three leading Israeli representatives, Barak, Livni and Olmert, are currently at odds over the conditions and guarantees under which they are willing to implement a ceasefire. The key is clearly Egypt and it consists in a guarantee of tunnel checks and smuggling checks which would be acceptable to the Egyptian side. What is the Council doing at this time? How is it proceeding in negotiations with the Egyptian side on the technical mission, international monitoring, technical surveillance, and the opening of the EU BAM Rafah? What can the MEPs meeting tonight with the Egyptian ambassador demand of the Egyptian side, or vice versa, how can we contribute to the negotiations with Egypt?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph