Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-12-17-Speech-3-230"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081217.16.3-230"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-12-17-Speech-3-2312
lpv:speaker	lp:Adam Bielan2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2007-09-11--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-05-23--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2007-09-05--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; UEN (2007-08-29--2009-07-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3 substitute; TRAN (2007-09-05--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2007-09-06--2009-07-13)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Active and inactive time while on duty is an important issue for many professions, especially doctors. Dividing shifts into active and inactive time on duty is contrary to the concept of working time and key regulations on working conditions. Is it possible for someone to monitor when a doctor takes a break during a shift, or when they are carrying out their duties by performing an emergency procedure, providing treatment or planning the next operation? Besides, attempts to monitor these things would involve employing inspectors and would incur ridiculous costs. Such a move would simply be incompatible with professional ethics."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph