Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-12-17-Speech-3-170"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081217.16.3-170"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-12-17-Speech-3-1712
lpv:speaker	lp:Christian Ehler2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with India (2007-04-26--2009-07-13)3 substitute; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2007-04-10--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". − My ‘no’ is not a rejection of an efficient Emissions Trading Scheme involving auctioning, nor of the EU’s climate-protection targets or of the funding for CCS. A number of previous votes and my report on CCS demonstration facilities have made my support on these points abundantly clear. For my region, Brandenburg, however, the present text means enshrining unfair competition with Central and Eastern European countries and greater energy price rises than are necessary to meet the climate protection targets. We need coal in our energy mix in order to ensure security of supply for our citizens, and we want to enable the climate-friendly use of coal by means of CCS technology in future. The agreement with the Council to take a final decision after just one reading has meant that strong reservations have not been dispelled and competition for the best solutions has not been possible."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph