Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-10-23-Speech-4-147"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081023.21.4-147"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-10-23-Speech-4-1482
lpv:speaker	lp:Lars Wohlin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Kristdemokraterna (2006-09-28--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2006-09-26--2009-07-13)3 substitute; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I have been opposed to the proposal ever since it was put before Parliament because I believe that the Chicago Convention, which at present regulates the basic provisions governing airport charges, should have the same significance for the Member States in the future too. There is no reason to change rules that are generally accepted and thus can be regulated only by the Member States. New EU legislation means that, in the event of a dispute, pricing can ultimately be interpreted by the European Court of Justice, and this was obviously one of the reasons why the proposal was put forward. I nevertheless think that there is reason to be sceptical when the European Court of Justice has to interpret binding Community legislation. I am worried by the reluctance to take account of national provisions where certain issues are concerned. I think that, in the future too, there must be reasons to question the role of the European Court of Justice, especially on this issue."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph