Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-10-21-Speech-2-480"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-10-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Promotion of clean road transport vehicles (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081021.44.2-480"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-10-21-Speech-2-4812
lpv:speaker	lp:Vittorio Prodi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2008-05-28--2009-07-13)3 chair; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2008-05-28--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Partito Democratico (2008-02-07--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-06-07--2009-02-04)3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to thank Mr Jørgensen for the report. I believe that this really is an action that is consistent with the entire energy and environment package that we are debating. It will certainly have an effect on public procurement procedures, undoubtedly guiding the choices made by the institutions, but first and foremost – upstream of that – guiding the choices made by manufacturers. This truly equates to the presentation of a coherent framework of specifications that vehicles will have to meet in relation to both the parameters for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other parameters directly relating to pollution and health. A monetary evaluation would also be of some concern: as far as carbon dioxide is concerned, this is already a current topic for the Kyoto Protocol in terms of emissions trading. In other areas, it would also strictly mean a monetisation of health, or a monetary evaluation of health. It is clear, though, here that the specific aim is to find points of comparison, certainly not to encourage but rather to reduce emissions, including those that have an impact on health. Thus, there are technical specifications for energy efficiency and environmental performance. That is the major opportunity which this directive offers. The situation is therefore clear but it does not restrict the choices available to institutions. I am rather amazed by the opposition voiced, which seems to me to be full of preconceptions. This directive makes a strong suggestion to the institutions, but in my view it is directed above all at vehicle manufacturers."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph