Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-09-24-Speech-3-168"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20080924.28.3-168"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The implementation of SIS II had to be postponed several times due to technical difficulties. At the time, the new Eastern European Member States, for example, faced major problems at their borders and therefore pressed for the introduction of a 'stop-gap programme'. That may have been a sensible approach in view of the situation at that time, but it undoubtedly resulted in additional costs being incurred.
Experience with the current SIS model seems to be positive. In the long term, the programme must of course be developed further. Improvised interim solutions can cause security gaps, however, which is why I have rejected the planned introduction of the improvised version, as I believe that it is premature."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples