Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-09-23-Speech-2-307"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-09-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system - Investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector - The liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of an accident - Port State control (recast) - Ship inspection and survey organisations (Directive recast) - Ship inspection and survey organisations (Regulation recast) (continuation of debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080923.36.2-307"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-09-23-Speech-2-3082
lpv:speaker	lp:Jaromír Kohlíček2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2007-06-26--2009-07-13)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". − Let me please try to summarise why the maritime package should be discussed as a single entity and not as a set of reports from which the Council and the Commission can pick and choose, push some forward, set some aside and wait for the next presidency or the one after that. First of all, it is essential to establish in the same way, in all cases, in all these reports, to which ships all the proposals apply. There were differences in the initial reports. I should like to draw your attention to this once more. Secondly, safety is indivisible and therefore it is vital to strengthen the responsibility of the flag state. This responsibility must be clearly defined because, without responsibility on the part of the flag state, it will be impossible to take this package forward. Thirdly, the fair treatment of seafarers on ships running into difficulties must be generally accepted. Whether someone has adopted the IMO guidelines or not is immaterial. Fourthly, the environment is so important that discussion as to who is responsible for maritime transport in the event of problems with one ship or another must cease, and buck-passing must be sidelined. There will be just one person in each state who decides where a ship in difficulties can go. Fifthly, if there is an accident, it must be made clear within the timeframe laid down who is going to conduct the technical investigation, which state is responsible, where the final report is to be sent and what the structure of the report is to be, otherwise we are simply playing games. The independence of the investigative body is an obvious requirement. Sixthly, if I could ask you, Commissioner and Mr Bussereau, to listen to the wishes not only of the European Parliament, but also of the citizens of the Union and look at the maritime package as a single entity."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph