Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-04-21-Speech-1-239"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-04-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:New Flame shipwreck and its consequences in Algeciras Bay (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080421.21.1-239"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-04-21-Speech-1-2402
lpv:speaker	lp:Willy Meyer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-06-21--2009-07-13)3 substitute; DEVE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PETI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, since August I have taken part in various Parliamentary initiatives and have made various speeches in this plenary. The basic issue − as we all know – is that the area around the Straits is one of the busiest areas in Europe for maritime traffic with more than 100 000 vessels per annum, 30 000 of which anchor in the area between the Bay of Algeciras and Gibraltar. The underlying problem is that these two ports have no body to coordinate and monitor maritime traffic. That is the basic problem. We are launching a clear and precise initiative so that the two Member States involved in this matter can resolve this lack of coordination as soon as possible. We are talking about two ports with the greatest volume of maritime traffic and it is unacceptable, in this day and age, that there is still no monitoring entity. We are not just talking about the we also had the and the and these are incidents which obviously threaten maritime safety, the safety of persons and the natural environment. Therefore, I think that Europe must take the initiative and give the Member States a clear directive. It is unacceptable, in the 21st century, for the vessel still to be in its current condition. Perhaps Spain was wrong to entrust salvage of the vessel to Gibraltar? Perhaps the two administrations should have done it jointly? I have a substantive matter to put to the Commissioner. I put a question to the Commission – which Mr Dimas answered in March – highlighting an issue which is still not clear, namely what the vessel was carrying in its hold. What type of scrap metal was it carrying? The Commission replied saying that it was carrying 700 tonnes of IFO-380 fuel but we still do not know what type of scrap metal. I think that this is unacceptable. I call on the Commission to tell us once and for all what type of scrap metal the vessel was carrying."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"New Flame"1 "Samotraki"1 "Sierra Nava"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph