Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-04-09-Speech-3-237"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-04-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Research Fund for Coal and Steel (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080409.25.3-237"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-04-09-Speech-3-2382
lpv:speaker	lp:Rebecca Harms2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; G/EFA (2007-02-27--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-22--2009-02-04)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I am one of those people who championed the irrelevant amendments in committee. Yet in line with what Mrs Laperrouze said about coal, it is not at all clear to me why the Commission should stipulate subsidising coal as it were. Coal has been subsidised to an unbelievable extent for 50 years, and continuing this is contrary to all the EU’s statements on climate policy. We believe that, on the contrary, these coal subsidies should be replaced with more consistent support for renewable energies and energy efficiency. Otherwise Europe will not be in a position to meet its targets on climate policy. Steel is another story. Yet the Commission has omitted to make it clear that steel continues to be subsidised and coal does not. In my opinion sufficient provision has already been made for coal, a dirty energy source, in the Seventh Framework Research Programme."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph