Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-02-20-Speech-3-183"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-02-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080220.10.3-183"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-02-20-Speech-3-1842
lpv:speaker	lp:Lars Wohlin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Kristdemokraterna (2006-09-28--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2006-09-26--2009-07-13)3 substitute; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". The constitution should be rejected. We need a new constitution, not just a new name. A fundamental revision is needed which, like a constitution in the normal sense, limits and clarifies the powers of the European Court of Justice and the role of the EU. It is important to define which matters are of a supranational nature, i.e. matters such as free trade, climate change, the fight against international crime, terrorism, and integration. It is notable that in all these areas Britain has been a driving force throughout the development of the EU. My view is that Sweden should demand the same exceptions Britain was given, both its opt-in and its opt-out clauses. There is no reason to treat Sweden any differently. Sweden’s citizens have voted ‘no’ to the euro and it would only be reasonable for the next treaty to make clear that Sweden is not required to participate in monetary cooperation. None of this can be found in the current proposal, which is why I have chosen to vote against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph