Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-01-30-Speech-3-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-01-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:US anti-missile defence system (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080130.18.3-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-01-30-Speech-3-1062
lpv:speaker	lp:Janusz Onyszkiewicz2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Unia Wolnosci/Partia Demokratyczna - demokraci.pl (2005-06-17--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ALDE (2007-02-27--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, may I first remind everyone that the missile defence shield is not only an issue for Poland and the Czech Republic: it concerns the United Kingdom and Denmark too, since facilities in both those countries are also to be included in the system. So let us not talk only about Poland or the Czech Republic. The second point is that the missile defence shield, and the installations that form part of it, will not be a magnet for terrorists. Terrorists strike at soft targets, not well-defended military bases. Finally, a third point. The European Union is not a military ally. Perhaps it is pity that it isn’t, but that is the fact of the matter, and the new treaty, the Treaty of Lisbon, changes nothing in that respect. That being so, a defence issue is either NATO’s responsibility or the responsibility of countries that have not decided to join an alliance and wish to defend themselves separately. Obviously, there has to be a discussion in NATO about how this system should fit into other systems that NATO intends to develop. That is absolutely essential. Let us not forget that 21 countries in the European Union are members of NATO."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph