Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-01-15-Speech-2-127"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20080115.21.2-127"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Colleagues, I have to remind you that 19 Members have requested time for oral explanations of vote on each of the seven reports that were adopted before lunch. There are a further 10 individual requests for explanations of vote. Theoretically the time required for explanations of vote would thus be 143 minutes, something more than two hours. In order to be able to take these explanations of vote today, I therefore propose the following change in the order of business:
We would take the Commission’s statement on waste in the Campania region, which is currently scheduled for 9 p.m., immediately after the Angelilli report on the rights of the child.
The explanations of vote would then be taken during the evening sitting, after the oral question on the status of elected MEPs in Poland.
The order of business would thus be as follows:
from 3 to 5.30 p.m.: Cashman report, Angelilli report, then the Commission statement on waste in the Campania region
from 5.30 to 7 p.m.: Commission Question Time
then during the evening sitting from 9 p.m. to midnight we would have, in order: the Pack report, the Graefe zu Baringdorf report, the oral question on the status of elected MEPs in Poland and finally the explanations of vote on those items put to the vote before lunch."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples