Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-12-13-Speech-4-157"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071213.23.4-157"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-12-13-Speech-4-1582
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 member; NA (2007-11-14--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". Mass imports, the perverse role played by a strong euro against a deliberately undervalued foreign currency, social and environmental dumping, counterfeits, piracy, dangerous products, and the existence of non-tariff barriers that hit European manufacturing: in the textiles sector as in others, every report and resolution by this Parliament on trade relations with China looks the same. Why was China’s membership of the WTO accepted under these circumstances? We voted against it. Why refuse to see that liberalising trade with countries that have decided not to obey the rules – and you never challenge this liberalisation – only leads to economic disaster and social disintegration for whole regions and sectors? Why accept the end of textile quotas and the laying off of tens of thousands of European workers? You are worried about it now, but you only talk timidly of possible means of commercial defence, safeguard measures and joint surveillance of exports. It is not much, and it is not enough, but it is better than nothing. Therefore, though this resolution is about as useful as a chocolate teapot, we will vote in favour."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph