Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-24-Speech-3-115"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-10-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Immunity and privileges of Gian Paolo Gobbo (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071024.19.3-115"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-10-24-Speech-3-1162
lpv:speaker	lp:Francesco Enrico Speroni2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; UEN (2006-12-13--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-04-25--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; JURI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Lega Nord per l'indipendenza della Padania (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DROI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; IMCO (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I too am in favour of referring the matter back to committee, although my reasons might be a little different. In actual fact, judging by Rules 5, 6 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure and Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol, Parliament clearly is not competent to express a view on the facts alleged against Mr Gobbo, simply because at the time of those facts Gian Paolo Gobbo was not a Member of the European Parliament. Article 9 of the Protocol, which safeguards MEPs’ freedom of expression, refers to people who were Members of this House when they used certain terms or committed acts identifiable with them. Since Mr Gobbo was not an MEP at the time of the facts, I believe that the most proper solution should be for Parliament to refrain from taking a stance because he was not a colleague of ours."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph