Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-09-25-Speech-2-322"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20070925.33.2-322"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Question No 36 is inadmissible as its author is no longer a Member. Question No 37 by Ioannis Gklavakis () On 4 July 2007 the Commission unveiled a proposal for a Council regulation on the common organisation of the market in wine (). Funds for the 'national envelopes' are allocated according to a key which is based to 50% on the historical input of Member States, 25% on area and 25% on production. Moreover, adjustments have been made in favour of certain Member States. Will the Commission say which criteria were used in the selection of the specific allocation key and why the funds are not allocated on the basis of the historical payments of Member States over a representative reference period, as occurred in the case of all those CMOs which have so far been amended? Furthermore, given that the overall amount of resources is limited, how was it decided to adjust input for the benefit of some Member States, which necessarily results in a corresponding decrease for the others?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Amendment of the CMO in wine"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph