Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-09-03-Speech-1-103"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-09-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Better Regulation - Better law-making 2005:, subsidiarity and proportionality - Simplification of the regulatory environment - Use of 'soft law' (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070903.17.1-103"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-09-03-Speech-1-1042
lpv:speaker	lp:Zbigniew Kuźmiuk2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-21--2009-02-04)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; UEN (2005-12-13--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-04-25--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, in taking the floor on behalf of the UEN Group in this debate on better law-making in the European Union, I should like to draw attention to the following issues. Fourthly, it should also be pointed out that the reports contained proposals for alternative solutions regarding the introduction of new legislation. The former included self-regulation or mutual recognition of national provisions, and even the option of not undertaking any legislative action. All these proposals merit detailed consideration in view of the dramatic increase in Union legislation. Firstly, the authors advocate better law-making, aimed at increasing the efficiency, effectiveness, cohesion and transparency of Union legislation. Consequently, the process should comply with the following conditions, and I support this view: it is essential for the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament to work together on the matter; there should be broad and open consultation on the matter with all interested parties, including entrepreneurs, local authorities and non-governmental organisations, and I would like to emphasise the importance of such consultation; Community bodies should be given more responsibility for the law-making process and the overall transparency of the process should be improved; every assessment of legislation aimed at its simplification should, however, ascribe equal importance to economic and social issues, and take account of issues relating to health and environmental protection; in addition, the process of simplifying legislation should not lead to a lowering of the standards enshrined in the Union’s current . Secondly, the authors also point out that unnecessary and unclear expressions should be avoided when drafting legal provisions. The language used should be straightforward and easy to understand. At the same time, the terminology should be precise and legal certainty ensured, so that the Union’s legislation can be understood by its citizens, who now number almost 500 million. Thirdly, the decision taken at the 2007 Spring Council to achieve a 25% reduction of the administrative burden resulting from Union legislation by 2012 should be warmly welcomed. We can but hope that this objective is more realistic and has a greater chance of being achieved than the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"acquis"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph