Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-07-11-Speech-3-231"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-07-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070711.22.3-231"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-07-11-Speech-3-2322
lpv:speaker	lp:Lena Ek2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Centerpartiet (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2007-03-27--2009-07-13)3 substitute; FEMM (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2009-02-04)3 substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I support the report, but I wish to address three points of principle that it was not possible to vote on in plenary. The first is the view of small companies. It is quite clear that we can move towards both increased security for workers and increased flexibility and still have simpler rules for small companies. The report has taken no account of this fact, and that is something I deeply regret. The second point I wish to address is the Scandinavian approach or, as it is formulated in the report, the Scandinavian situation. There are, however, very big differences between the Scandinavian countries. The former Swedish Social Democratic Government did not do enough work on either flexibility or security, which has led to our situation in Sweden being radically different from that in Denmark. That particularly applies to youth unemployment, which is more than three times higher in Sweden than it is in Denmark. The last point I wish to address is the view of women’s position in life and in working life, with the report expressing an incredibly old-fashioned view of gender equality."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph