Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-06-21-Speech-4-139"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-06-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070621.20.4-139"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-06-21-Speech-4-1402
lpv:speaker	lp:Andreas Mölzer2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFET (2007-01-31--2008-09-03)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; ITS (2007-01-15--2007-11-13)3 member; AFCO (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". The only commendable point in the report is the plan to conduct information campaigns in the countries of origin. I voted against the proposal, because as long as the United Kingdom accepts 12% of all applications from refugees and Sweden rubber stamps 91% of requests, we will never be able to agree. We cannot tackle asylum shopping with harmonised EU regulations when asylum rights are abused to avoid the legal immigration rules and when our processes are drawn out by pointless appeals, even where there are no grounds for granting asylum. As long as it is still possible to throw away one's papers, say the magic word, asylum, and remain in the EU for years, there will always be plenty of ways for thieves to stay on the move or go to ground. The only way to tackle this abuse is to only accept asylum applications made in reception camps outside the EU's borders."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph