Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-05-22-Speech-2-162"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-05-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070522.21.2-162"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-05-22-Speech-2-1632
lpv:speaker	lp:Pedro Guerreiro2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2005-01-13--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (2005-01-13--2009-07-13)3,3 vice-chair; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2005-03-08--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2005-01-18--2009-07-13)3,3 member; REGI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". In spite of our vote in favour of the report before us – which approves the proposal for a regulation in question – we are concerned about Article 3(2) of the regulation, which allows the Commission to consider license applications from any Member State when Member States covered by this agreement have not exhausted the fishing opportunities to which they are entitled. We feel that in the event of the under-use of fishing opportunities granted to a Member State as part of quotas and licences, the Commission should consult the Member States in question with a view to ensuring the optimum use of fishing opportunities, including the possibility of transferring unused fishing opportunities to other Member States. We believe, however, that this possibility should not undermine the principle of relative stability; it should not, in other words, have any influence on the future award of fishing opportunities to Member States in the context of these partnerships. As such, we support the amendment clarifying this point."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph