Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-04-23-Speech-1-101"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-04-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Advanced therapy medicinal products (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070423.17.1-101"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-04-23-Speech-1-1022
lpv:speaker	lp:Hiltrud Breyer2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; FEMM (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; JURI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, before I speak for the committee, I should like to point out an error to Commissioner Verheugen. I think it is improper that he should give the impression that those who tabled the compromise had made sure it would make rapid progress; the very opposite was the case, for it was those individuals who put forward the compromise who voted ‘no’ in the first vote in the committee. Now, though, for what I have to say on behalf of the committee. The Rules of Procedure give the committee a most prominent role in the treatment of ethical issues, and I trust that everyone here accepts that – not just the Council and the Commission, but also many Members of this House, none of whom, I hope, are seeking to deny the members of the Committee on Legal Affairs their authority in matters of law. We have considered this report in very great depth and adopted a multitude of amendments, two of which in particular – I am referring to Amendments 3 and 17 – were referred directly to the plenary in accordance with the enhanced procedure and are extremely important. The committee calls for the reference to embryonic stem cells to be deleted, but why? As you know, the Court of Justice’s interpretation of Article 95 is that a fully harmonised measure must not allow derogations for Member States, so, it being a matter of doubt as to whether the article would stand up to the Court’s scrutiny, the committee has therefore proposed a precise wording supplementary to Article 28; that alone makes for legal certainty and clarity and is, most important of all, capable of standing up in the European Court of Justice."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph