Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-14-Speech-3-326"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Council Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070214.23.3-326"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-14-Speech-3-3272
lpv:speaker	lp:Danutė Budreikaitė2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway and to the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2005-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; INTA (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Darbo partija (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; DEVE (2007-02-01--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The European Central Bank has its own stable inflation indicator, which is just nearing 2%. However, when the Maastricht criteria are applied, this is not taken into consideration. Under the Maastricht criteria, the inflation indicator is calculated according to an entirely different methodology, which in no way correlates to the inflation indicator of the European Central Bank. Would it not appear that these indicators should be coordinated, so that it would be clear to everyone just what exactly the stable inflation rate is?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph