Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-14-Speech-3-190"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20070214.17.3-190"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". Parliament has already rejected the Commission’s proposal for voluntary modulation of direct payments under the CAP of up to 20%. According to this proposal, funds earmarked for farmers would be provided under the second pillar of the CAP, namely rural development; that is to say, they would pass to the national budgets of the Member States that decide to employ this modulation. The removal of aid for farmers would raise issues of competition between farmers from countries that do not employ modulation and those from countries that do, and between farmers in the latter category depending on the level of modulation decided upon. For this reason I share the view of the rapporteur, Mr Goepel, that we should once again reject the Commission's proposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph