Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-13-Speech-2-181"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070213.17.2-181"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-13-Speech-2-1822
lpv:speaker	lp:Alain Hutchinson2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2007-01-25--2009-06-22)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2004-09-20--2007-03-13)3 substitute; DROI (2007-01-31--2009-06-22)3 member; REGI (2007-01-31--2007-09-02)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-06-22)3 substitute; DEVE (2007-01-31--2007-09-02)3 unknown; Parti Socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-06-22)3
lpv:translated text	"Commissioner, thank you for your answer, which, in my view, is closer to waffle than to a real answer to the questions I have asked you on the liberalisation of postal services. In one question, I alluded to the solutions being studied by the Committee of Enquiry into post liberalisation. When we talk about solutions, that means there is a problem, but we can see at the moment that, when it comes to the delivery of small mail items – which is the topic on the agenda – there is no problem. The people are happy, and deliveries are running smoothly. In contrast, where the delivery of small items has been liberalised, such as in Sweden, stamps are more expensive and the service is worse. Commissioner, why is the Commission ruling out retaining the reserved area with which we are familiar, which enables and safeguards the universal service for all Europeans, as would certainly not be the case with the projects you are proposing, as previous experience has demonstrated?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph