Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-12-Speech-2-289"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20061212.44.2-289"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Question No 37 by Sharon Bowles () The Commission’s report on the Functioning of the Transitional Arrangements set out in the 2003 Accession Treaty shows that workers’ mobility from the EU Member State entrants of 2004 to the EU15 has on the whole had a positive effect. Is the Commission therefore disappointed that Member States such as the UK and Ireland have decided to curb the rights of Romanians and Bulgarians to work within their respective countries once Romania and Bulgaria become full EU members on 1 January? Does the Commission believe this will have any negative economic effects both within those Member States and across the EU as a whole or that it may push more people to work illegally? Does the Commission believe the unease expressed by some Member States about an ‘influx’ of migrant workers is a genuine concern, given that the UK, Ireland and Sweden (which did not apply restrictions after May 2004) experienced a drop in unemployment, a rise in employment and high economic growth?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Workers from Romania and Bulgaria"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph