Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-25-Speech-3-321"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20061025.26.3-321"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Question No 3 by Sarah Ludford () What is the state of play in the Council regarding the proposed ‘Framework Decision on the recognition and enforcement in the EU of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children’? It would mean that if a paedophile or child molester was disqualified from working with children after conviction for a sex attack or involvement in child pornography in one Member State, that information would be shared so that their name could be entered on other national sex offender registers and the ban enforced EU-wide. Why has the Council apparently been unable so far to agree on this important proposal which the European Parliament backed in June 2006 and which would give a practical example to Europe's citizens of the EU’s valuable role in combating crime and increasing security? Has the Council abandoned its declared goal of prioritising the fight against the sexual exploitation of children?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Sharing information on convicted paedophiles"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph