Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-25-Speech-3-098"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Peace process in Spain (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061025.7.3-098"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-25-Speech-3-0992
lpv:speaker	lp:Mirosław Piotrowski2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-11-18--2006-12-12)3 substitute; REGI (2004-07-21--2006-12-12)3 substitute; SEDE (2005-07-13--2006-12-12)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2004-09-22--2007-03-13)3 chair_of_the_bureau; IND/DEM (2006-02-02--2006-12-12)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Liga Polskich Rodzin (2004-07-20--2006-12-03)3 member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, may I enquire if there has been some misunderstanding? According to our voting lists, the first vote was by show of hands. The second vote, on the resolution tabled by the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats, was by roll call. According to our lists, however, this vote should have been on the Socialists’ resolution and we voted against, in the belief that it was the second vote. Have I understood correctly that the vote that has taken place was the first vote? I would like to point out that many of my Polish colleagues and also colleagues from the Czech Republic and other countries voted in the same way. Could the situation be clarified, please?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph