Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-23-Speech-1-097"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Establishment, operation and use of SIS II (regulation) – Establishment, operation and use of SIS II (decision) – Access to SIS II by the services responsible for issuing vehicle registration certificates (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061023.16.1-097"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-23-Speech-1-0982
lpv:speaker	lp:Kinga Gál2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2004-09-15--2007-01-14)3 member; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-20--2006-12-31)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DROI (2004-09-16--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"The integration of the European Union has reached an important milestone with the vote in the European Parliament on the regulations creating the legislative basis for the second-generation Schengen Information System. Parliament has indicated that it will do everything in its power to ensure that the promises made in the course of enlargement are fulfilled, and that the new Member States can join the Schengen system as soon as possible. Thanks are due to the rapporteur, who has done everything possible for this to be achieved. It is precisely in order to avoid further delay that it is important for Parliament and the Council to reach an agreement on first reading. Thus, it is strange that, while here in Parliament we are striving to establish the legal background as quickly as possible and are prepared to accept compromises, the government representatives on the Council are voting on passages that will necessarily delay the solution. The key question regarding the path towards lifting the internal borders under Schengen is to know when the new Member States will be able to join the Schengen Information System; according to the Commission this is causing considerable delay. The objection given is that SIS II has taken longer to complete than planned, but one cannot help but presume that there are political reasons for the delay, although the Commission invokes technical reasons. But I would like to ask, can this justify maintaining this clearly discriminatory situation? Is it not irresponsible to burden the new Member States with so great a security deficit? For Hungary, as for the other new Member States, one of the main challenges since accession has been to attain full Schengen membership. In popular opinion, this is one of the signs of the credibility of enlargement, and therefore we have to be open to any solution that can make it possible for entry into this system to take place by the planned deadline. The Commission, the Council, and Parliament have a great responsibility in this regard."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph