Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-26-Speech-2-110"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060926.20.2-110"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Whereas, on the one hand, we accept that there are differences between and within the Member States as regards the inclusion of the European dimension in education, and that, given the crucial importance of languages, the COMENIUS and LINGUA programmes should be awarded more substantial Community funding, we disagree, on the other hand, that there is a single vision of so-called European history and values.
Each country has its particular characteristics and each people its own history, and yet even this can be viewed from different angles depending on one's perspective.
We feel that Europe’s richness comes from its diversity of its cultures and languages, and this is something that must be preserved. Any standardisation must be avoided.
Accordingly, although the report highlights some positive points as regards language and other skills, following up previous reports and existing Community programmes, we are opposed to any attempt at standardisation to which it might lead. Hence our abstention."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples