Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-26-Speech-2-057"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-09-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Services of general interest (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060926.3.2-057"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-09-26-Speech-2-0582
lpv:speaker	lp:Roselyne Bachelot-narquin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (2004-07-20--2007-05-17)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-09-16--2007-03-13)3 member; EMPL (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2007-05-17)3 substitute; JURI (2005-06-27--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, fellow Members, you usefully referred, Mr Barroso, to the four basic principles that need to guide our thinking about services of general interest. Paradoxically, it might be thought that you have reopened the debate on the need either to have a framework directive on services of general economic interest or to choose sectoral initiatives in relation to social or health services. The vote on the Services Directive altered the parameters in favour of the second solution since the real dividing line lies not between services of economic and non-economic general interest but – within services of general economic interest – between social and health services and other services. This development was reinforced by the detailed and legally painstaking work done by the rapporteur, Mr Rapkay, and our colleague, Mr Hökmark, who constructed a legal bridge between the Services Directive and the sectoral instruments. Indeed, a framework directive on services of general economic interest raises three difficulties. Firstly, the Treaty on European Union offers no legal basis, as has been pointed out on many occasions. Next, this directive would be incompatible with the scope of the Services Directive, as voted on at first reading on 29 May. Finally, it in no respect meets the need for legal certainty expressed by the players and, at the same time, it threatens the subsidiarity called for by Member States and local authorities. Whatever the instrument selected and the ideological choices that will help determine the option we choose, these are not what matter in the end. The work of legal clarification needs to be continued in the field of social and health services of general interest. That, Mr Barroso, is the practical problem faced by the actors on the ground."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph